1. burgerking:

Chicken Fries. Oreo Shake. Perfection.

    burgerking:

    Chicken Fries. Oreo Shake. Perfection.

    Reblogged from: burgerking
  2. Coach Tachibana (◕‿◕✿)

    Reblogged from: fangirling-for-yaoi
  3. thehpalliance:

If you use YouTube, you need to know this.
You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.
This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.
Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.
Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.
Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.
It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.
If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue. 
Sign the petition, then spread the word.

    thehpalliance:

    If you use YouTube, you need to know this.

    You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.

    This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.

    Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.

    Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.

    Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.

    It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.

    If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue.

    Sign the petition, then spread the word.

    Reblogged from: chuuface
  4. doyouwannabuildasnowman:

invanity-wetrust:

ticklesthesomething:

geminihoneybee:

olitwist:

toluicacid:

pink-nation-xoxo:

disney-rapunzel-merida-vanellope:

Let’s give a moment to those mothers that can not have a child…

and to the husbands that stick by their wives regardless of wether they can have a child

This was the most realistic Disney movie ever.

yeah the part where the house flies off due to a bunch of balloons was very realistic 



Actually they consulted an architect about how many balloons exactly it would take to do that to a house of that exact size and weight. They calculated that moment using a physics engine and took everything into account. Unless a professional architect as well as all of the physics professors who put their effort into that highly advanced physics engine are wrong, that take off was actually very doable and scientifically accurate.

GET WRECKED SON

It just got better

    doyouwannabuildasnowman:

    invanity-wetrust:

    ticklesthesomething:

    geminihoneybee:

    olitwist:

    toluicacid:

    pink-nation-xoxo:

    disney-rapunzel-merida-vanellope:

    Let’s give a moment to those mothers that can not have a child…

    and to the husbands that stick by their wives regardless of wether they can have a child

    This was the most realistic Disney movie ever.

    yeah the part where the house flies off due to a bunch of balloons was very realistic 

    Actually they consulted an architect about how many balloons exactly it would take to do that to a house of that exact size and weight. They calculated that moment using a physics engine and took everything into account. Unless a professional architect as well as all of the physics professors who put their effort into that highly advanced physics engine are wrong, that take off was actually very doable and scientifically accurate.

    GET WRECKED SON

    It just got better

    Reblogged from: ruinedchildhood
  5. rifa:

    check-your-privilege-feminists:

    Tumblr: spreading the world apart, one group at a time.

    THIS is the shit that bothers me with tumblr

    Reblogged from: ballsontherampage
  6. haezelsgus:

    "I’m telling you," Isaac continued, “Augustus Waters talked so much that he’d interrupt you at his own funeral. And he was pretentious: Sweet Jesus Christ, that kid never took a piss without pondering the abundant metaphorical resonances of human waste production. And he was vain: I do not believe I have ever met a more physically attractive person who was more acutely aware of his own physical attractiveness.”

    Reblogged from: nothingfeelslikehomelikeyou
  7. theblackcatstirs:

shiningartifact:

ziusik:

thinly:


-Sir, we’ve found this and we needed you to name it.
-Pineapple.
-But we figured we might as well just call it “Ananas” since the majority of the world refers to it as-
-Pineapple.
-But sir-
-Pine. Apple.

CRYING I HAVE TO REBLOG IM SORRY OMFG

PINE. APPLE.

LOL THIS IS THE GREATEST.

If this doesn’t perfectly sum up the English language I don’t know what does

    theblackcatstirs:

    shiningartifact:

    ziusik:

    thinly:

    -Sir, we’ve found this and we needed you to name it.

    -Pineapple.

    -But we figured we might as well just call it “Ananas” since the majority of the world refers to it as-

    -Pineapple.

    -But sir-

    -Pine. Apple.

    CRYING I HAVE TO REBLOG IM SORRY OMFG

    PINE. APPLE.

    LOL THIS IS THE GREATEST.

    If this doesn’t perfectly sum up the English language I don’t know what does

    Reblogged from: nothingfeelslikehomelikeyou
  8. amortizing:

    You are perfect. Stop wishing you liked someone else, or wishing people liked you as much as they like someone else. Stop trying to get attention from those who hurt you. Stop hating your body, your face, your personality, your quirks. Love them. Without those things you wouldn’t be you…

    Read More

    Reblogged from: yelled
  9. 4gifs:

[Previously / video]
    Reblogged from: 4gifs
  10. sizvideos:

    Watch it in video

    Follow our Tumblr - Like us on Facebook

    Reblogged from: sizvideos
Next

democratic unicorns

Paper theme built by Thomas